You’ve heard it all...

“Fragrance is toxic.”
“Fragrance disrupts hormones.”
“Fragrance is why your skin is irritated.”

And honestly… I get why people latch onto it.

Because “fragrance” is vague.
It sounds like a cover-up word.
It’s everywhere.
And when someone’s skin is acting up, we all want a clean culprit we can point to.

But here’s the problem.

Most people have strong feelings about fragrance…without actually knowing what it is.

So before we decide whether fragrance is harmless or harmful, we should do something that’s become strangely rare in skincare:

Let’s define the term first.

Then we can talk about the myths.

And then we can talk about what actually matters.

What Is “Fragrance,” Technically?

On an ingredient list, “fragrance” (or “parfum”) is what’s called a composite ingredient.

That simply means it’s a blend.

Instead of being a single molecule, it’s a mixture of aromatic compounds combined to create a specific scent.

Those compounds can be:

• Synthetic aroma molecules

• Naturally derived aroma isolates

• Essential oils

• Or a combination of all three

So fragrance is not “one chemical.”

It’s a small formula inside a bigger formula.

That’s it.

Why Is It Listed As One Ingredient?

This is where labeling confuses people.

Ingredient lists are meant to tell you what ingredients are present — not to itemize every chemical compound inside each ingredient.

If labels had to list every constituent molecule inside every ingredient:

• A botanical extract would need a paragraph

• Essential oils would need a textbook

• And your ingredient list would be longer than your mortgage agreement

In other words: it becomes impractical fast.

Fragrance is listed as “fragrance” because it is a blend.

There is also an intellectual property layer (some fragrance formulas are proprietary), but that’s not the main reason you see one word.

The main reason is simply: it’s a composite ingredient.

And importantly, fragrance materials still need to comply with cosmetic regulations and safety standards, including guidelines set by IFRA (International Fragrance Association), which evaluates safe concentrations by product type.

Now that we’ve defined fragrance…

We can talk about why it triggers so much fear.

The Fragrance Myths (And What’s Actually True)

Fragrance is one of those ingredients that gets discussed like it’s either:

• Completely harmless, or

• A chemical weapon

Neither is accurate.

So let’s go myth by myth.

Myth #1: “Natural fragrance is safer than synthetic fragrance.”

This is one of the most persistent myths in skincare.

And it’s also the easiest to break.

Poison ivy is natural.
So is arsenic.

Insulin is synthetic.
99.99% of the Vitamin C used in supplements and skincare is synthetic.

Just think about how much vegetation would be required to satisfy the world's vitamin C demands...

Your skin does not care where something came from.

It cannot read “natural” on a label and relax.

It only responds to chemical structure and exposure.

In fact, some “natural fragrances” can be more reactive, because essential oils contain dozens of aromatic compounds, some of which are well-known sensitizers.

So no:

Natural does not automatically mean gentler.
Synthetic does not automatically mean harsher.

Safety is chemistry, not vibes.

Which brings us to the next myth.

Myth #2: “If it’s in the product, it must be doing something.”

Fragrance doesn’t improve skin function.

It doesn’t hydrate.
It doesn’t strengthen the barrier.
It doesn’t reduce pigmentation.
It doesn’t increase collagen.

Its job is sensory.

And sensory has value. We’re humans, not robots.

But there’s a difference between feeling good and doing good for skin.

Fragrance can make a routine more enjoyable.

But if someone has sensitive skin, that enjoyment may come with a tradeoff.

Which leads to what most people actually mean when they say “fragrance is bad.”

They’re talking about irritation.

Myth #3: “Fragrance is toxic.”

This is where the conversation usually goes off the rails.

Because most fragrance concerns are not about toxicity.

They’re about irritation and sensitization.

Those are different things.

So let’s define them in plain English:

Irritation means the skin barrier is being disrupted directly — stinging, burning, tightness, redness.

Sensitization means your immune system decides it no longer likes a substance — often after repeated exposure over time.

And this is critical...

Skin reactions are usually a function of dose, exposure, and duration.

How much.
How often.
How long it stays on your skin.

A small amount in a rinse-off cleanser? Low exposure.

A strongly scented leave-on cream used daily? Higher exposure.

Also worth noting: fragrance reactions tend to show up as:

• Stinging or burning

• Itching

• Persistent redness

• Tiny uniform bumps

• Often around the eyes, jawline, or neck

Not always dramatic. Often just “my skin feels off.”

So the more accurate statement isn’t:

“Fragrance is toxic.”

It’s:

Fragrance can be a common trigger for irritation or allergy — especially in leave-on facial products and especially when the barrier is already compromised.

Which leads to an important distinction.

Myth #4: “It doesn’t matter whether it’s rinse-off or leave-on.”

It matters a lot.

Rinse-off products (shampoo, body wash, hand soap) sit on your skin briefly and are washed away.

Leave-on products (creams, serums) stay on your skin for hours.

Exposure time is completely different.

And there’s another layer:

Facial skin is thinner and more reactive than body skin.

So something your arms tolerate beautifully may irritate your face.

That’s not you being “sensitive.”

That’s facial physiology.

Which brings us to the myth that tends to get the most fear attached to it.

---

Myth #5: “Fragrance disrupts hormones because of phthalates.”

This one needs calm clarification.

Phthalates are a family of compounds used in many industries.

The mistake people make is assuming:

If some phthalates are a problem in industrial plastics, then any mention of “phthalates” in cosmetics must mean danger.

That’s like saying...

“Some mushrooms are poisonous, therefore all mushrooms are deadly.”

The only phthalate still used in personal care worldwide is diethyl phthalate (DEP).

DEP has been repeatedly evaluated and is considered safe at cosmetic exposure levels.

The phthalates associated with endocrine disruption concerns — like DBP and DMP — were phased out of cosmetics back decades ago.

They’re not relevant to modern regulated cosmetic fragrance systems - because they don't exist in them.

So this myth persists mostly because:

• “phthalates” sounds scary

• industrial exposure headlines get generalized

• nuance disappears

• fear spreads

Now, does that mean you have to go ahead and fall back in love with fragrance?

No.

It means the endocrine panic is usually aimed at the wrong target.

If fragrance is an issue for you, it’s far more likely to be irritation, not hormones.

Which brings us to what actually matters in real life.

The Only Question That Matters: How Does Your Skin Respond?

This is the part that makes people feel sane again.

Because you don’t need to become a toxicologist.

You just need to understand the variables:

• Where is it used? (face vs body)

• How long is it sitting there? (leave-on vs rinse-off)

• How compromised is the barrier? (especially after 40–50+)

If your skin tolerates fragrance beautifully, great. Enjoy it. Love it. 

If your skin reacts to fragrance, also great — now you know the variable to remove.

No moral judgment required.

Just data.

Now, let’s talk about how we handle it.

---

Where We Use Fragrance (And Why)

We are not anti-fragrance.

We’re pro-context.

Shampoo & Conditioner

We use essential oils — tea tree, peppermint, eucalyptus — where fragrance is secondary to function.

We chose them for their documented benefits for hair and scalp:

• Tea tree: antimicrobial support

• Peppermint: scalp stimulation and circulation support

• Eucalyptus: cooling and soothing properties

These products rinse off. Exposure is brief. The benefits are real.

Body Wash

We use fragrance — vanilla, sandalwood, cedarwood, bergamot — because we wanted something neutral but rich. Clean, grounding, not perfumey.

Again: rinse-off. Brief exposure. Body skin is typically more resilient.

Hand Soap

We use essential oils — patchouli, orange oil, cedarwood — because we wanted something that feels clean and slightly uplifting without being sharp.

Again: rinse-off.

Short contact time.

---

Where We Don’t Use Fragrance (And Why)

We don’t use fragrance in any leave-on products.

No essential oils.
No aromatic additives.

Leave-on exposure is cumulative.

And when an ingredient doesn’t improve skin function, we don’t include it in products that sit on it all day.

Not because fragrance is evil.

Because it’s unnecessary.

And unnecessary exposure is still exposure.

---

Final Word

Fragrance isn’t a villain.

It’s just another tool. And like any tool, it depends how it’s used.

Skincare doesn’t need absolutes.

It needs context.

If fragrance works for you, enjoy it.

If it doesn’t, remove it.

But either way, you can stop guessing.

Because now you understand the framework:

How much.
Where.
How long.
And what condition the skin is in.

Fear is loud.

Physiology is quiet.

We prefer quiet.

---

Sources

• Johansen JD, et al. Fragrance contact allergy: a review. Contact Dermatitis. 2003.

• Thyssen JP, et al. Contact sensitization to fragrances in the general population. Contact Dermatitis. 2009.

• Basketter DA, et al. Skin sensitization and exposure assessment: relevance of dose and frequency. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014.

• IFRA (International Fragrance Association). IFRA Standards & Safety Assessments.

• European Commission Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinions on fragrance allergens and cosmetic safety.

• Api AM. Toxicological profile of diethyl phthalate (DEP). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001.

• U.S. FDA. Cosmetics and phthalates: safety and regulatory overview.

• Elias PM, Feingold KR. Skin barrier function and barrier repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2006.

• Draelos ZD. Effects of cleansing and topical products on barrier function. Dermatol Clin. 2012.